E.D. Wis. · No. 2:26-cv-01822
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C3 Worldwide, LLCsource ↗ filed by Nye Stirling Hale Miller & Sweet LLP · Judge Stephen C. Dries · No. 2:26-cv-01822 · 42:2000 American Disabilities Act · view case timeline → Comparable settlements $65K–$530K ▾ADA accessibility claims split in comparables: Holmes v. Bax affirmed ADA violations, Burton revived injunctive claims, but Lowell v. Lyft affirmed dismissal for failure to prove effective modifications. Outcome is fact-dependent on specific accessibility barrier alleged. Comparable settlements $65K–$530K median $200K · n=3 Covenant Retiremen $530K · Association of Apa $200K · Home Depot U.S.A., $65K Key precedent: Lowell v. Lyft, Inc. (2d Cir.) — shows plaintiffs bear burden to prove proposed accommodations are reasonable/effective, a common failure point in ADA accessibility suits. Main risk: Dismissal for failure to plead a concrete, effective accommodation, as in Lowell v. Lyft's affirmance. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $5K–$550K Web signals mismatch defendant (C3.ai vs C3 Worldwide), class size and per-member figures are rough estimates given sparse, non-normalized data. · grounded in 8 rulings, 3 settlements, 0 verdicts | Filing | ADA / Accessibility | E.D. Wis. | 2026-10-02 | $65K–$530K comparable settlements |