E.D.N.Y · No. 2:26-cv-06211
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TransUnion, LLCsource ↗ filed by Stein Saks, PLLC · No. 2:26-cv-06211 · 15:1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act · view case timeline → Comparable settlements $2.40M–$100M ▾FCRA comparables split: Minano v. DLJ Mortgage Capital dismissed most furnisher claims (no private right of action, insufficient pleading), while Askins v. CRST let a bare disclosure violation survive on standing grounds. TransUnion itself has drawn a $40M jury verdict and an $8.3M EDPA settlement, showing juries/parties take FCRA exposure seriously once past the pleading stage. Comparable settlements $2.40M–$100M median $5.85M · n=10 Equifax $100M · Equifax Informatio $30M · Equifax $30M Per member (realized): ~$250 median · $25–$500 (n=5) Comparable verdict: TransUnion $60M · TransUnion, LLC $40M Key precedent: Minano v. DLJ Mortgage Capital Inc. — shows FCRA furnisher-duty claims are frequently dismissed unless pled with specificity; directly analogous risk for this complaint. Main risk: Dismissal under Minano-style reasoning for lacking a private right of action or insufficiently pled furnisher/reporting inaccuracy claims. This defendant: TransUnion shows repeat-litigant pattern: concurrent filings (Pinney, Ferguson, Cardona, Maxwell), a prior $40M verdict, and a $2.5M Wilson settlement. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $1.25M–$80M Small, heterogeneous comparable set mixing FCRA/FDCPA theories and jurisdictions; true class size and per-member figure highly fact-dependent on specific violation alleged. · grounded in 10 rulings, 10 settlements, 2 verdicts | Filing | Consumer Credit (FCRA/FDCPA) | E.D.N.Y | 2026-10-02 | $2.40M–$100M comparable settlements |