S.D. Fla. · No. 1:26-cv-26910
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 208 BISCAYNE PLAZA, LLCsource ↗ filed by Anthony J. Perez Law Group, PLLC · Judge Kathleen Mary Williams · No. 1:26-cv-26910 · 42:12182 Americans with Disabilities Act · view case timeline → Comparable settlements $65K–$530K ▾Comparable rulings split: Lowell v. Lyft and Billesdon show courts often dismiss ADA claims absent proof of effective, reasonable remedy, while Holmes v. Bax and Burton show accessibility claims can survive to injunctive relief. Title III ADA suits against small commercial landlords typically proceed on injunctive relief, not damages. Comparable settlements $65K–$530K median $200K · n=3 Covenant Retiremen $530K · Association of Apa $200K · Home Depot U.S.A., $65K Key precedent: Lowell v. Lyft (2d Cir.) - dismissal affirmed where plaintiff failed to prove proposed accommodation would be effective, a common pitfall in ADA accessibility suits. Main risk: Dismissal for failure to plead a specific, effective architectural remedy or lack of standing/imminent future injury, as in Lowell v. Lyft. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $5K–$30K Small, heterogeneous comp set (mostly non-ADA rulings); settlement comps involve much larger defendants, so figures are rough proxies, not direct analogs. · grounded in 8 rulings, 3 settlements, 0 verdicts | Filing | ADA / Accessibility | S.D. Fla. | 2026-10-01 | $65K–$530K comparable settlements |