S.D.N.Y. · No. 1:26-cv-08643
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brumate, LLCsource ↗ filed by Gottlieb & Associates · No. 1:26-cv-08643 · 28:1331 Fed. Question · view case timeline → Comparable settlements $65K–$530K ▾ADA accessibility claims show split outcomes: Lowell v. Lyft affirmed dismissal where plaintiff failed to prove effective modification, while Holmes v. Bax affirmed ADA violations at summary judgment. SDNY website-access suits typically survive early motions but face fact-specific reasonableness disputes. Comparable settlements $65K–$530K median $200K · n=3 Covenant Retiremen $530K · Association of Apa $200K · Home Depot U.S.A., $65K Key precedent: Lowell v. Lyft (2d Cir.) - affirmed dismissal, showing plaintiffs bear burden proving proposed accessibility fix is effective, a common failure point. Main risk: Dismissal for failure to plead a concrete, effective accessibility remedy, as in Lowell v. Lyft. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $5K–$35K Small, mismatched comparable settlement set (institutional, physical-access cases); true exposure for a single e-commerce website claim is likely far lower than aggregate benchmarks shown. · grounded in 8 rulings, 3 settlements, 0 verdicts | Filing | ADA / Accessibility | S.D.N.Y. | 2026-10-01 | $65K–$530K comparable settlements |