Williams v. Round21, Inc.

S.D.N.Y. · No. 1:26-cv-08642

No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).

Our records for this case (1)

Matter	Type	Practice area	Court	Date	Value
Round21, Inc.source ↗ filed by Gottlieb & Associates · No. 1:26-cv-08642 · 42:12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 · view case timeline → Comparable settlements $65K–$530K ▾ ADA web-accessibility claims split in comparables: Lowell v. Lyft affirmed dismissal for failure to show effective modification, while Holmes v. Bax affirmed ADA claims and Price v. Diab favored plaintiffs on fees/injunctive relief. Comparable settlements $65K–$530K median $200K · n=3 Covenant Retiremen $530K · Association of Apa $200K · Home Depot U.S.A., $65K Key precedent: Lowell v. Lyft (2d Cir.) — governs S.D.N.Y. ADA accessibility pleading standard, requiring plaintiff to prove proposed fix is effective, a common failure point. Main risk: Dismissal under Lowell-style reasoning if plaintiff can't show requested accommodation is effective or company lacks resources/scale to remediate. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $5K–$100K Small sample, no defendant-specific history, and class size is speculative given sparse web/company data. · grounded in 8 rulings, 3 settlements, 0 verdicts	Filing	ADA / Accessibility	S.D.N.Y.	2026-10-01	$65K–$530K comparable settlements