S.D.N.Y. · No. 1:26-cv-08633
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shoe Station Group, Inc.source ↗ filed by Usher Law Group P.C. · No. 1:26-cv-08633 · 42:12188 Americans With Disabilities Act - Civil Enforcement Actions · view case timeline → Comparable settlements $65K–$530K ▾Lowell v. Lyft shows ADA accessibility claims can be dismissed absent proof of effective modifications, while Price v. Diab shows plaintiffs who secure injunctive relief can still recover fees even via default. Outcome hinges heavily on specificity of the alleged barrier and remedy sought. Comparable settlements $65K–$530K median $200K · n=3 Covenant Retiremen $530K · Association of Apa $200K · Home Depot U.S.A., $65K Key precedent: Lowell v. Lyft (2d Cir.) - affirmed dismissal because plaintiff failed to prove modification would be effective, a common defense in ADA retail/access suits. Main risk: Dismissal for failure to plead a concrete, effective remedial modification, as in Lowell v. Lyft Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $5K–$500K Small sample, no prior records for this defendant, and ADA Title III typically yields injunctive relief/fees rather than per-member damages, limiting precision. · grounded in 8 rulings, 3 settlements, 0 verdicts | Filing | ADA / Accessibility | S.D.N.Y. | 2026-09-30 | $65K–$530K comparable settlements |