Zhang v. Artsana USA, Inc.

S.D.N.Y. · No. 1:26-cv-08628

No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).

Our records for this case (1)

Matter	Type	Practice area	Court	Date	Value
Artsana USA, Inc.source ↗ filed by Usher Law Group P.C. · No. 1:26-cv-08628 · 42:12188 Americans With Disabilities Act - Civil Enforcement Actions · view case timeline → Comparable settlements $65K–$530K ▾ Comparable ADA rulings split: Lowell v. Lyft (2d Cir.) affirmed dismissal for failure to prove reasonable modification, while Holmes v. Bax (8th Cir.) affirmed ADA violations and Price v. Diab upheld fee-shifting after default. No case directly on web/product accessibility tracks this fact pattern closely. Comparable settlements $65K–$530K median $200K · n=3 Covenant Retiremen $530K · Association of Apa $200K · Home Depot U.S.A., $65K Key precedent: Lowell v. Lyft (2d Cir.) — shows courts dismiss ADA accessibility claims where plaintiff fails to show proposed modification is effective, a common defense for retailers like Artsana. Main risk: Dismissal on standing/mootness or failure-to-prove-effectiveness grounds, as in Lowell v. Lyft. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $100K–$500K Single-plaintiff estimate; small comparable set and no Artsana-specific prior cases limit precision—treat as directional only. · grounded in 8 rulings, 3 settlements, 0 verdicts	Filing	ADA / Accessibility	S.D.N.Y.	2026-09-30	$65K–$530K comparable settlements