← Records

Zhang v. Stand Out For Good, Inc.

S.D.N.Y. · No. 1:26-cv-08625

Full docket on CourtListener ↗

No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).

Our records for this case (1)

MatterTypePractice areaCourtDateValue
Stand Out For Good, Inc.source ↗
filed by Usher Law Group P.C. · No. 1:26-cv-08625 · 42:12188 Americans With Disabilities Act - Civil Enforcement Actions · view case timeline →
Comparable settlements $65K–$530K ▾
ADA accessibility suits split sharply: Lowell v. Lyft shows courts affirm dismissal when plaintiff can't prove effective fix, while Price v. Diab and Holmes v. Bax show injunctive relief and fees survive when deficiencies are clear.
Comparable settlements $65K–$530K median $200K · n=3
Covenant Retiremen $530K · Association of Apa $200K · Home Depot U.S.A., $65K
Key precedent: Lowell v. Lyft (2d Cir.) - most analogous; dismissed ADA claim for failure to prove reasonable/effective modification, a common defense for retailers like Altar'd State.
Main risk: Plaintiff fails to show proposed accessibility fix is effective/reasonable, as in Lowell v. Lyft, leading to dismissal
Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $5K–$500K
Small, heterogeneous sample; true case likely single-plaintiff injunctive ADA suit, not class action — broad settlement comparables may overstate value. · grounded in 8 rulings, 3 settlements, 0 verdicts
FilingADA / AccessibilityS.D.N.Y.2026-09-30$65K–$530K
comparable settlements