E.D. Pa. · No. 2:26-cv-07538
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VISIONQUEST NATIONAL, LTD.source ↗ filed by Medina Morgan, LLC · Judge Karen Spencer Marston · No. 2:26-cv-07538 · 28:1332 Diversity-(Citizenship) · view case timeline → Comparable settlements $59.50M–$725M ▾Third Circuit's Santoro v. Tower Health affirmed dismissal of pixel-tracking health-data claims, directly binding on E.D. Pa., cutting against survival; but Bayhealth and Integris show confidentiality/privacy claims against service providers can survive where duty-based theories are pled. Comparable settlements $59.50M–$725M median $81.50M · n=10 Meta $725M · Google $425M · Google LLC $135M Per member (realized): ~$29 median · $29–$100 (n=3) Comparable verdict: Google LLC $425.70M · Google LLC $425.65M Key precedent: Santoro v. Tower Health (3rd Cir.) - binding circuit precedent dismissing similar tracking-technology privacy claims, most directly controlling for E.D. Pa. Main risk: Third Circuit precedent (Tower Health) dismissing analogous Meta Pixel/tracking claims could compel dismissal in this circuit This defendant: Three prior Privacy & Wiretap filings (Luppino, Thompson, Walker) against VisionQuest suggest repeated/systemic tracking practice or recurring plaintiff-firm targeting. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $50K–$1.70M Small, heterogeneous comparable set; class size and exact tracking-technology theory unconfirmed from web signals, limiting precision. · grounded in 9 rulings, 10 settlements, 4 verdicts | Filing | Privacy & Wiretap | E.D. Pa. | 2026-09-30 | $59.50M–$725M comparable settlements |