D.S.C. · No. 2:26-cv-04365
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3M COMPANY (f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co.)source ↗ filed by Jason J Joy and Associates PLLC · Judge Richard Mark Gergel · No. 2:26-cv-04365 · 28:1332 Diversity-Personal Injury · view case timeline → Comparable settlements $59.50M–$725M ▾Pixel/tracking privacy claims show split outcomes: Bayhealth and Gunnar Optiks survived while Tower Health and Santoro were dismissed; no 3M-specific wiretap precedent exists, so the theory's viability here is uncertain. Comparable settlements $59.50M–$725M median $81.50M · n=10 Meta $725M · Google $425M · Google LLC $135M Per member (realized): ~$29 median · $29–$100 (n=3) Comparable verdict: Google LLC $425.70M · Google LLC $425.65M Key precedent: Doe v. Bayhealth Medical Ctr. shows confidentiality/tracking claims can survive MTD when duty and disclosure are well-pled, a plausible template for 3M's wiretap theory. Main risk: Dismissal on loss-causation/standing grounds similar to Tower Health, where Meta Pixel claims failed despite plausible disclosure allegations. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $6.50M–$225M No defendant-specific incident data or prior 3M privacy litigation; class size and per-member figures are rough proxies from analogous tech-sector cases. · grounded in 9 rulings, 10 settlements, 4 verdicts | Filing | Privacy & Wiretap | D.S.C. | 2026-09-30 | $59.50M–$725M comparable settlements |