E.D. Pa. · No. 2:26-cv-07535
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VISIONQUEST NATIONAL, LTD.source ↗ filed by Medina Morgan, LLC · Judge Nitza I. Quinones Alejandro · No. 2:26-cv-07535 · 28:1332 Diversity-(Citizenship) · view case timeline → Comparable settlements $59.50M–$725M ▾Third Circuit precedent in Santoro v. Tower Health dismissed near-identical Meta Pixel health-privacy claims with prejudice, directly binding E.D. Pa. However, Doe v. Bayhealth shows confidentiality claims against healthcare-adjacent providers can survive where a duty analogous to physician-patient relationship exists. Comparable settlements $59.50M–$725M median $81.50M · n=10 Meta $725M · Google $425M · Google LLC $135M Per member (realized): ~$29 median · $29–$100 (n=3) Comparable verdict: Google LLC $425.70M · Google LLC $425.65M Key precedent: Santoro v. Tower Health (3rd Cir.) - same circuit, dismissed Meta Pixel health-info sharing claim; controls E.D. Pa. outcome here. Main risk: Binding Third Circuit precedent (Tower Health) dismissing substantially similar pixel/tracking health-privacy claims in the same jurisdiction This defendant: Three prior suits (Luppino, Thompson, Myers) on identical theory suggest repeated/serial litigation over same tracking practice. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $58K–$4M No confirmed class-size or revenue data for VisionQuest; estimate relies on inferred smaller scale vs. tech-company comparables and thin sample of settlements/rulings. · grounded in 9 rulings, 10 settlements, 4 verdicts | Filing | Privacy & Wiretap | E.D. Pa. | 2026-09-30 | $59.50M–$725M comparable settlements |