M.D. Fla. · No. 8:26-cv-02992
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dedicated Senior Medical Center of Florida LLCsource ↗ filed by Imler Law · Judge William Frederic Jung · No. 8:26-cv-02992 · 28:451 Employment Discrimination · view case timeline → Comparable settlements $59.50M–$725M ▾Healthcare tracking-tech privacy claims split: Doe v. Bayhealth allowed breach-of-confidentiality claims to survive, while Santoro v. Tower Health affirmed dismissal of Meta Pixel health-data claims; Integris Health shows state privacy claims often remanded/unresolved rather than killed outright. Comparable settlements $59.50M–$725M median $81.50M · n=10 Meta $725M · Google $425M · Google LLC $135M Per member (realized): ~$29 median · $29–$100 (n=3) Comparable verdict: Google LLC $425.70M · Google LLC $425.65M Key precedent: Doe v. Bayhealth Medical Ctr. — most analogous, survived MTD on duty-of-confidentiality theory for healthcare provider tracking tech disclosures. Main risk: Dismissal mirroring Santoro v. Tower Health, where 3rd Cir. affirmed dismissal of Meta Pixel health-data disclosure claims with prejudice. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $75K–$1.50M No prior litigation history for this defendant; class size is inferred from web presence, not confirmed patient records; small-n settlement benchmark skewed by mega-cap tech outliers. · grounded in 9 rulings, 10 settlements, 4 verdicts | Filing | Privacy & Wiretap | M.D. Fla. | 2026-09-30 | $59.50M–$725M comparable settlements |