S.D.N.Y. · No. 1:26-cv-08573
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bambulab Usa Inc.source ↗ filed by Gottlieb & Associates · No. 1:26-cv-08573 · 42:12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 · view case timeline → Comparable settlements $65K–$530K ▾ADA accessibility claims split in comparables: Lowell v. Lyft affirmed dismissal for failure to prove effective modification, while Holmes v. Bax and Price v. Diab affirmed ADA liability/injunctive relief. Outcome likely turns on whether Bambulab's website/product accessibility barriers are concretely pled and remediable. Comparable settlements $65K–$530K median $200K · n=3 Covenant Retiremen $530K · Association of Apa $200K · Home Depot U.S.A., $65K Key precedent: Lowell v. Lyft, Inc. (2d Cir.) - controls in S.D.N.Y.; shows courts demand plaintiff prove proposed accommodation is reasonable/effective, raising dismissal risk here. Main risk: Dismissal for failure to plead a concrete, provable accessibility barrier or effective remedy, as in Lowell v. Lyft. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $5K–$500K Small, heterogeneous comparable set mixing employment, facility, and web-access ADA claims; no prior Bambulab litigation history; class size highly uncertain. · grounded in 8 rulings, 3 settlements, 0 verdicts | Filing | ADA / Accessibility | S.D.N.Y. | 2026-09-30 | $65K–$530K comparable settlements |