S.D. Fla. · No. 1:26-cv-26831
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Macaba Corp.source ↗ filed by Anthony J. Perez Law Group, PLLC · No. 1:26-cv-26831 · 42:12182 Americans with Disabilities Act · view case timeline → Comparable settlements $65K–$530K ▾ADA accessibility outcomes split in comparables: Lowell v. Lyft affirmed dismissal for failure to prove reasonable modification, while Holmes v. Bax affirmed ADA violations and Price v. Diab upheld relief via default. S.D. Fla. is a high-volume ADA Title III forum where outcomes hinge heavily on standing/mootness and remediation efforts. Comparable settlements $65K–$530K median $200K · n=3 Covenant Retiremen $530K · Association of Apa $200K · Home Depot U.S.A., $65K Key precedent: Lowell v. Lyft (2d Cir.) matters most — it shows courts require plaintiffs to prove proposed accommodations are effective, a common failure point in ADA accessibility suits like this one. Main risk: Mootness/standing dismissal if defendant remediates access barrier before judgment, as nearly happened in Burton v. Chase Point before remand. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $2K–$12K No damages class mechanism typically exists under ADA Title III; estimate assumes single-plaintiff injunctive/fee-driven resolution, not a class fund. · grounded in 8 rulings, 3 settlements, 0 verdicts | Filing | ADA / Accessibility | S.D. Fla. | 2026-09-29 | $65K–$530K comparable settlements |