S.D. Fla. · No. 1:26-cv-26826
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18335 NW 27 AVE LLCsource ↗ filed by Anthony J. Perez Law Group, PLLC · No. 1:26-cv-26826 · 42:12182 Americans with Disabilities Act · view case timeline → Comparable settlements $65K–$530K ▾ADA Title III accessibility suits against small commercial property owners typically survive motion to dismiss if barrier allegations are specific, as in Holmes v. Bax affirming ADA claims, but Lowell v. Lyft shows plaintiffs bear burden on reasonableness of requested modifications. Comparable settlements $65K–$530K median $200K · n=3 Covenant Retiremen $530K · Association of Apa $200K · Home Depot U.S.A., $65K Key precedent: Lowell v. Lyft, Inc. matters because it shows ADA claims can fail if plaintiff doesn't prove proposed accommodation is effective/reasonable, a common defense in access-barrier suits. Main risk: Single-plaintiff ADA Title III suits yield only injunctive relief and fees, not damages; risk of dismissal if barriers are remediated or standing/mootness challenged, as flagged in Burton v. Chase Point. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $5K–$25K No damages class exists under ADA Title III; database settlements/verdicts reflect larger corporate defendants and may overstate recovery for this small single-property LLC. · grounded in 8 rulings, 3 settlements, 0 verdicts | Filing | ADA / Accessibility | S.D. Fla. | 2026-09-29 | $65K–$530K comparable settlements |