N.D. Tex. · No. 4:26-cv-01255
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Charter Communications, Inc.source ↗ filed by Sulaiman Law Group Ltd · Judge Mark Timothy Pittman · No. 4:26-cv-01255 · 47:227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment · view case timeline → Comparable settlements $29.50M–$76M ▾TCPA robocall claims show split outcomes: Howard and Hulce affirmed dismissals on narrow technical grounds, while League of Women Voters v. Kramer denied a motion to dismiss on a robocall theory, showing courts will sustain well-pled TCPA claims lacking the specific defects seen in dismissed cases. Comparable settlements $29.50M–$76M median $36.20M · n=10 Caribbean Cruise L $76M · Dish Network $61M · US Coachways $49.90M Per member (realized): ~$20 median · $10–$500 (n=4) Comparable verdict: Dish Network, L.L.C. $61M · ccAdvertising and Dr $32.42M Key precedent: League of Women Voters v. Kramer (D.N.H.) - MTD denied on TCPA robocall claim, most factually analogous to a generic mass robocall/text theory against Charter. Main risk: Dismissal on 'artificial/prerecorded voice' definitional grounds or lack of ATDS/autodialer allegations, as in Howard v. RNC (9th Cir.). This defendant: Prior state-court filings against Charter/Spectrum suggest repeat exposure to consumer-communications litigation. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $2M–$75M Small, heterogeneous comparable set with fact-specific dismissals; no details yet on Charter's actual calling practices or class contours. · grounded in 10 rulings, 10 settlements, 3 verdicts | Filing | Robocalls & Texts (TCPA) | N.D. Tex. | 2026-09-29 | $29.50M–$76M comparable settlements |