Lopez v. Babo Botanicals, Inc.

S.D.N.Y. · No. 1:26-cv-08497

No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).

Our records for this case (1)

Matter	Type	Practice area	Court	Date	Value
Babo Botanicals, Inc.source ↗ filed by Gottlieb & Associates · No. 1:26-cv-08497 · 42:12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 · view case timeline → Comparable settlements $65K–$530K ▾ Comparable ADA rulings split: Lowell v. Lyft affirmed dismissal because plaintiff failed to prove reasonableness of requested modification, while Price v. Diab and Holmes v. Bax show courts affirming ADA relief when plaintiffs meet evidentiary burden. Outcome hinges heavily on whether plaintiff can show a specific, provable accessibility barrier. Comparable settlements $65K–$530K median $200K · n=3 Covenant Retiremen $530K · Association of Apa $200K · Home Depot U.S.A., $65K Key precedent: Lowell v. Lyft, Inc. (2d Cir.) — controlling circuit precedent placing burden on plaintiff to prove effective modification, directly applicable in S.D.N.Y. Main risk: Failure to plead a concrete, provably effective accommodation, as in Lowell v. Lyft, leading to dismissal Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $50K–$250K Small, heterogeneous comparable set; no prior Babo Botanicals record; ADA accessibility cases rarely proceed as damages classes, limiting precision of per-member math. · grounded in 8 rulings, 3 settlements, 0 verdicts	Filing	ADA / Accessibility	S.D.N.Y.	2026-09-29	$65K–$530K comparable settlements