S.D.N.Y. · No. 1:26-cv-08496
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amouage Americas LLCsource ↗ filed by Gottlieb & Associates · No. 1:26-cv-08496 · 42:12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 · view case timeline → Comparable settlements $65K–$530K ▾Lowell v. Lyft (2d Cir.) shows courts require plaintiffs to prove proposed accessibility fixes are effective, a real dismissal risk; but ADA Title III web/access suits in S.D.N.Y. commonly survive early motions and pressure quick settlement. Comparable settlements $65K–$530K median $200K · n=3 Covenant Retiremen $530K · Association of Apa $200K · Home Depot U.S.A., $65K Key precedent: Lowell v. Lyft (2d Cir.) — affirmed dismissal because plaintiff failed to prove modification would be effective, a hurdle Amouage could exploit. Main risk: Dismissal for failure to plead a concrete, effective accommodation, as in Lowell v. Lyft Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $3K–$125K Small, mismatched comparable set (mostly larger institutional/class settlements); true case appears to be a single-plaintiff accessibility suit, limiting precision. · grounded in 8 rulings, 3 settlements, 0 verdicts | Filing | ADA / Accessibility | S.D.N.Y. | 2026-09-29 | $65K–$530K comparable settlements |