E.D. Pa. · No. 2:26-cv-07471
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TRANS UNION, LLCsource ↗ filed by Vullings Law Group, LLC · Judge John Milton Younge · No. 2:26-cv-07471 · 15:1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act · view case timeline → Comparable settlements $2.40M–$100M ▾FCRA furnisher claims are frequently narrowed or dismissed (Minano v. DLJ) for lacking private right of action, while disclosure-based claims can survive (Askins v. CRST). TransUnion faces recurring FCRA suits and has settled comparable EDPA class actions before. Comparable settlements $2.40M–$100M median $5.85M · n=10 Equifax $100M · Equifax $30M · Equifax Informatio $30M Per member (realized): ~$250 median · $25–$500 (n=5) Comparable verdict: TransUnion $60M · TransUnion, LLC $40M Key precedent: Minano v. DLJ Mortgage Capital - shows courts routinely dismiss specific FCRA furnisher theories but allow re-pleading, setting likely early-motion battleground. Main risk: Dismissal of core FCRA counts for lacking private right of action or insufficient factual specificity, as in Minano. This defendant: Multiple concurrent FCRA filings against TransUnion (Cobbs, Ho, Out, Lisman, Johnson, Chas) suggest repeat, systemic reporting-accuracy disputes. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $5M–$150M Small, heterogeneous comparable set; individual vs. class posture unclear, limiting precision of size/value estimates. · grounded in 10 rulings, 10 settlements, 2 verdicts | Filing | Consumer Credit (FCRA/FDCPA) | E.D. Pa. | 2026-09-28 | $2.40M–$100M comparable settlements |