← Records

McCormick v. Stetson University

M.D. Fla. · No. 6:26-cv-02252

Full docket on CourtListener ↗

No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).

Our records for this case (1)

MatterTypePractice areaCourtDateValue
Stetson Universitysource ↗
filed by LLG National Law Group · No. 6:26-cv-02252 · Americans with Disabilities Act · view case timeline →
Comparable settlements $65K–$530K ▾
ADA accessibility rulings are split: Holmes v. Bax affirmed ADA violations while Lowell v. Lyft and Billesdon affirmed dismissal, showing courts require plaintiffs to prove effective, reasonable barriers existed. M.D. Fla. has no clear pattern shown here.
Comparable settlements $65K–$530K median $200K · n=3
Covenant Retiremen $530K · Association of Apa $200K · Home Depot U.S.A., $65K
Key precedent: Lowell v. Lyft — plaintiff bears burden showing requested accommodation is reasonable/effective; likely applies to Stetson facility/digital access claims.
Main risk: Dismissal for failure to show a reasonable, effective accommodation was denied, as in Lowell v. Lyft.
Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $40K–$300K
Small, heterogeneous comparable set; no defendant-specific history; class size and per-member figures are rough estimates absent case-specific plaintiff count. · grounded in 7 rulings, 3 settlements, 0 verdicts
FilingADA / AccessibilityM.D. Fla.2026-09-28$65K–$530K
comparable settlements