S.D.N.Y. · No. 1:26-cv-08451
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alastin Skincare, Inc.source ↗ filed by Joseph & Norinsberg, LLC · No. 1:26-cv-08451 · 42:12188 Americans With Disabilities Act - Civil Enforcement Actions · view case timeline → Comparable settlements $65K–$530K ▾ADA web/accessibility claims split in comparables: Lowell v. Lyft affirmed dismissal for failure to show effective modifications, while Holmes v. Bax affirmed ADA violations and Price v. Diab upheld relief via default judgment. Outcome hinges heavily on specificity of alleged barriers and remediation feasibility. Comparable settlements $65K–$530K median $200K · n=3 Covenant Retiremen $530K · Association of Apa $200K · Home Depot U.S.A., $65K Key precedent: Lowell v. Lyft, Inc. (2d Cir.) — governs SDNY ADA claims; plaintiff bears burden to show proposed accommodation is reasonable/effective, a frequent dismissal trigger. Main risk: Dismissal for failure to plead a concrete, effective accessibility remedy, as in Lowell v. Lyft. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $5K–$100K No prior Alastin-specific data, no class certified; estimate based on generic ADA website-accessibility litigation patterns, not case-specific facts. · grounded in 7 rulings, 3 settlements, 0 verdicts | Filing | ADA / Accessibility | S.D.N.Y. | 2026-09-28 | $65K–$530K comparable settlements |