E.D. Pa. · No. 2:26-cv-07428
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TRANS UNION, LLCsource ↗ filed by Vullings Law Group, LLC · No. 2:26-cv-07428 · 15:1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act · view case timeline → Comparable settlements $2.40M–$100M ▾FCRA claims against furnishers/CRAs are frequently narrowed at the pleading stage (Minano v. DLJ Mortgage dismissed multiple FCRA counts for no private right of action/insufficiency), while disclosure-based claims can survive (Askins v. CRST). Trans Union has repeatedly settled similar reporting-accuracy claims rather than litigate to verdict. Comparable settlements $2.40M–$100M median $5.85M · n=10 Equifax $100M · Equifax $30M · Equifax Informatio $30M Per member (realized): ~$102 median · $25–$500 (n=3) Comparable verdict: TransUnion $60M · TransUnion, LLC $40M Key precedent: Minano v. DLJ Mortgage Capital - shows FCRA furnisher/CRA claims often dismissed unless specific statutory hooks (e.g., reinvestigation duty) are well-pled. Main risk: Partial dismissal of statutory counts lacking private right of action, as in Minano, narrowing case to weaker residual claims. This defendant: Six prior FCRA/FDCPA filings against Trans Union suggest a repeat-litigation pattern and established settlement playbook. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $700K–$22.50M Small, heterogeneous comparable set; actual class size/per-member recovery hinge on specific FCRA provision and class certification outcome. · grounded in 10 rulings, 10 settlements, 2 verdicts | Filing | Consumer Credit (FCRA/FDCPA) | E.D. Pa. | 2026-09-25 | $2.40M–$100M comparable settlements |