D. Colo. · No. 1:26-cv-04761
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oneflight International, Inc.source ↗ filed by Blank Rome LLP · No. 1:26-cv-04761 · 28:1332 Diversity · view case timeline → Comparable settlements $200M–$740M ▾No comparable rulings directly address false advertising in aviation/charter services; the mixed bag of cited cases (Cetorelli’s CSPA win, Guthrie’s certification denial) shows outcomes hinge heavily on individualized proof of misrepresentation, which courts scrutinize closely. Comparable settlements $200M–$740M median $274.75M · n=10 DiDi Global Inc. $740M · Merck & Co. Inc. a $688M · Toyota Industries $436M Per member (realized): ~$2,500 median · $2,500–$2,500 (n=1) Comparable verdict: Papaya $420M · Vital Pharmaceutical $293M Key precedent: Guthrie v. Transamerica — denial of certification where claims required individualized inquiry into representations, a risk mirrored in ONEflight's customer-specific charter dealings. Main risk: Individualized reliance/representation issues could defeat class certification, as in Guthrie v. Transamerica. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $200K–$7.50M Small, unrelated comparable set and single-point settlement benchmark make this a highly uncertain, low-confidence estimate. · grounded in 10 rulings, 10 settlements, 9 verdicts | Filing | False Advertising | D. Colo. | 2026-09-25 | $200M–$740M comparable settlements |