E.D. Pa. · No. 2:26-cv-07424
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DATAVAULT AI INC.source ↗ filed by BERGER MONTAGUE PC · No. 2:26-cv-07424 · 15:78m(a) Securities Exchange Act · view case timeline → Comparable settlements $59.50M–$725M ▾Comparables split: Bayhealth and Clements (BIPA) survived pleading-stage challenges while Tower Health (Meta Pixel) and Nuance (BIPA/GLBA exemption) were dismissed, showing privacy/wiretap claims often turn on fact-specific consent or exemption issues. DataVault AI's small scale and novel data-tokenization business make outcome hard to predict. Comparable settlements $59.50M–$725M median $81.50M · n=10 Meta $725M · Google $425M · Google LLC $135M Per member (realized): ~$29 median · $29–$29 (n=2) Comparable verdict: Google LLC $425.70M · Google LLC $425.65M Key precedent: Doe v. Bayhealth Medical Ctr. — breach-of-confidentiality claim survived MTD, showing courts will sustain privacy claims against data-handling defendants when a duty of confidentiality is plausibly alleged. Main risk: Dismissal on statutory/exemption grounds akin to Nuance (GLBA/BIPA exemption) or Tower Health (undue delay/failure to plead concrete harm). Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $145K–$4.35M Small sample size, no prior DataVault litigation history, and class size is speculative given limited disclosed user metrics. · grounded in 8 rulings, 10 settlements, 4 verdicts | Filing | Privacy & Wiretap | E.D. Pa. | 2026-09-25 | $59.50M–$725M comparable settlements |