D.S.C. · No. 4:26-cv-04265
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Georgetown Hospital Systemsource ↗ filed by Hunt Law · Judge Joseph Dawson III · No. 4:26-cv-04265 · 42:2000 Job Discrimination (Race) · view case timeline → Comparable settlements $59.50M–$725M ▾Health-data tracking claims split: Doe v. Bayhealth survived on confidentiality theory while Santoro v. Tower Health was dismissed for Meta Pixel disclosures; Integris shows removal fails but state privacy claims remain unclear, so outcome is fact-dependent on tracking tech used. Comparable settlements $59.50M–$725M median $81.50M · n=10 Meta $725M · Google $425M · Google LLC $135M Per member (realized): ~$29 median · $29–$29 (n=2) Comparable verdict: Google LLC $425.70M · Google LLC $425.65M Key precedent: Doe v. Bayhealth Medical Ctr. — closest facts (hospital tracking tech disclosure), survived MTD on confidentiality duty theory. Main risk: Dismissal on Meta/tracking-pixel theory as in Tower Health, where amendment and disclosure claims failed with prejudice. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $300K–$10.50M Small comparable sample, ambiguous defendant identity (multiple 'Georgetown' entities), and wide class-size uncertainty limit precision. · grounded in 8 rulings, 10 settlements, 4 verdicts | Filing | Privacy & Wiretap | D.S.C. | 2026-09-25 | $59.50M–$725M comparable settlements |