← Records

Kishore et, al. v. Carrio Motor Cars, Inc

S.D. Fla. · No. 0:26-cv-62712

Full docket on CourtListener ↗

No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).

Our records for this case (1)

MatterTypePractice areaCourtDateValue
Carrio Motor Cars, Incsource ↗
filed by Geoffrey D Ittleman PA · Judge Cecilia M. Altonaga · No. 0:26-cv-62712 · 49:32701 Federal Odometer Act · view case timeline →
Comparable settlements $200M–$740M ▾
State consumer-protection claims like FDUTPA analogues have survived (Cetorelli treble damages affirmed) while similar 'deceptive practices' class claims were rejected at cert or on the merits (Guthrie affirmed denial of certification; Citizens of Humanity affirmed dismissal of a 'Made in USA' claim). Small single-location defendant makes large-scale precedent poorly analogous.
Comparable settlements $200M–$740M median $274.75M · n=10
DiDi Global Inc. $740M · Merck & Co. Inc. a $688M · Toyota Industries $436M
Per member (realized): ~$2,500 median · $2,500–$2,500 (n=1)
Comparable verdict: Papaya $420M · VPX, Inc. $293M
Key precedent: Cetorelli v. Duell Action Builders - affirms that deceptive-practices claims against a small local business can survive and yield treble damages/fees, closely analogous to Carrio's size and posture.
Main risk: Individualized reliance/communication issues (as in Guthrie) could defeat class certification even if individual false-advertising claims survive dismissal
Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $62K–$625K
National mega-settlements/verdicts in the dataset are not scale-comparable to a small single-location dealership; estimate is highly speculative given n=1 per-member benchmark and no prior history on this defendant. · grounded in 10 rulings, 10 settlements, 9 verdicts
FilingFalse AdvertisingS.D. Fla.2026-09-25$200M–$740M
comparable settlements