S.D.N.Y. · No. 1:26-cv-08364
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cardhaus Games, LLCsource ↗ filed by Gottlieb & Associates · No. 1:26-cv-08364 · 28:1331 Fed. Question · view case timeline → Comparable settlements $65K–$530K ▾Lowell v. Lyft (2d Cir.) shows courts require plaintiffs to prove modifications are effective, often dismissing ADA claims, while Holmes v. Bax affirmed ADA violations at summary judgment, showing split outcomes depending on evidentiary depth. Comparable settlements $65K–$530K median $200K · n=3 Covenant Retiremen $530K · Association of Apa $200K · Home Depot U.S.A., $65K Key precedent: Lowell v. Lyft (2d Cir.) - controls in S.D.N.Y.'s circuit; sets high bar for plaintiffs to show effective accommodation, a common failure point in ADA website suits. Main risk: Dismissal for failure to prove proposed accessibility fix is 'reasonable' and 'effective,' as in Lowell v. Lyft. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $1K–$38K Tiny defendant and single/few-plaintiff likely posture make settlement comps (large retailers) a poor scale match; high uncertainty. · grounded in 7 rulings, 3 settlements, 0 verdicts | Filing | ADA / Accessibility | S.D.N.Y. | 2026-09-25 | $65K–$530K comparable settlements |