D. Maryland · No. 1:26-cv-03787
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Weightless Medical LLCsource ↗ filed by Mason & Perry LLP · Judge Brendan Abell Hurson · No. 1:26-cv-03787 · 28:1332 Diversity-Deceptive Trade Practices · view case timeline → Comparable settlements $59.50M–$725M ▾Medical-provider tracking-tech privacy claims split: Bayhealth's confidentiality claim survived while Tower Health's Meta Pixel claim was dismissed with prejudice; Integris shows state-law tracking claims often remanded but outcome-unclear on merits. Comparable settlements $59.50M–$725M median $81.50M · n=10 Meta $725M · Google $425M · Google LLC $135M Per member (realized): ~$29 median · $29–$29 (n=2) Comparable verdict: Google LLC $425.70M · Google LLC $425.65M Key precedent: Doe v. Bayhealth Medical Ctr. — confirms medical providers can face viable confidentiality claims for tracking-tech disclosures, directly analogous to Weightless's likely pixel/tracker exposure. Main risk: Dismissal on causation/standing grounds as in Tower Health, or lack of 'interception' under wiretap theory if disclosures deemed routine business analytics Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $75K–$1.45M Small sample of rulings, no prior litigation history for this defendant, and class size is inferred from limited web signals rather than confirmed patient data. · grounded in 8 rulings, 10 settlements, 4 verdicts | Filing | Privacy & Wiretap | D. Maryland | 2026-09-24 | $59.50M–$725M comparable settlements |