S.D.N.Y. · No. 1:26-cv-08329
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Diva Fam, Inc.source ↗ filed by Gottlieb & Associates · No. 1:26-cv-08329 · 42:12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 · view case timeline → Comparable settlements $65K–$530K ▾Lowell v. Lyft shows plaintiffs must prove modifications are effective, a common defense in ADA web-access suits; Price v. Diab confirms fee-shifting risk even on default judgments, pressuring quick settlement. Comparable settlements $65K–$530K median $200K · n=3 Covenant Retiremen $530K · Association of Apa $200K · Home Depot U.S.A., $65K Key precedent: Lowell v. Lyft (2d Cir.) - affirmed dismissal where plaintiff failed to prove proposed accessibility fix was effective, relevant SDNY ADA standard. Main risk: Plaintiff may fail to show concrete, effective remedy, risking dismissal like Lowell v. Lyft Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $5K–$25K Small, low-revenue defendant (5 suppliers, 0 customers listed) suggests limited settlement capacity; data sparse and non-normalized. · grounded in 7 rulings, 3 settlements, 0 verdicts | Filing | ADA / Accessibility | S.D.N.Y. | 2026-09-24 | $65K–$530K comparable settlements |