E.D. Mo. · No. 4:26-cv-01517
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capitol South, Inc.source ↗ filed by SCHAPIRO LAW GROUP PL · Judge Stephen Robert Clark Sr. · No. 4:26-cv-01517 · 42:12101 Americans with Disabilities Act · view case timeline → Comparable settlements $65K–$530K ▾ADA accessibility claims show mixed outcomes: Holmes v. Bax affirmed ADA violations, while Lowell v. Lyft affirmed dismissal for failure to prove reasonable modification. Outcome depends heavily on specific accessibility facts not yet clear here. Comparable settlements $65K–$530K median $200K · n=3 Covenant Retiremen $530K · Association of Apa $200K · Home Depot U.S.A., $65K Key precedent: Lowell v. Lyft (2d Cir.) - shows plaintiffs bear burden proving modification effectiveness, a common dismissal ground in ADA accessibility suits. Main risk: Dismissal for failure to plead concrete, provable accessibility barrier or effective remedy, as in Lowell v. Lyft Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): –$125K Web signals are largely irrelevant/noisy (mismatched entities), defendant identity and case facts unconfirmed, small comparable sample limits precision. · grounded in 7 rulings, 3 settlements, 0 verdicts | Filing | ADA / Accessibility | E.D. Mo. | 2026-09-23 | $65K–$530K comparable settlements |