← Records

Horowitz v. SMX (Security Matters) Public Limited Company

S.D.N.Y. · No. 1:26-cv-08321

Full docket on CourtListener ↗

No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).

Our records for this case (1)

MatterTypePractice areaCourtDateValue
SMX (Security Matters) Public Limited Companysource ↗
filed by Harris St. Laurent LLP · No. 1:26-cv-08321 · 28:1332fr Diversity-Fraud · view case timeline →
Comparable settlements $200M–$740M ▾
Only Guthrie (UCL fraud claims, cert denied) and Citizens of Humanity ('Made in USA' labeling, dismissed) are true false-advertising analogs, both unfavorable to plaintiffs; the rest of the comparables are off-theory and add little predictive weight.
Comparable settlements $200M–$740M median $274.75M · n=10
DiDi Global Inc. $740M · Merck & Co. Inc. a $688M · Toyota Industries $436M
Per member (realized): ~$2,500 median · $2,500–$2,500 (n=1)
Comparable verdict: Papaya $420M · Vital Pharmaceutical $293M
Key precedent: Guthrie v. Transamerica - courts often deny certification of advertising-fraud claims requiring individualized reliance inquiry, a risk SMX's varied customer base shares.
Main risk: Individualized reliance/causation issues (Guthrie) could defeat class certification even if the complaint survives dismissal.
Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $88K–$4.38M
Extremely thin comparable set for false advertising specifically; defendant is a micro-cap with no prior litigation history, making class size and recovery highly speculative. · grounded in 10 rulings, 10 settlements, 9 verdicts
FilingFalse AdvertisingS.D.N.Y.2026-09-23$200M–$740M
comparable settlements