N.D. Cal. · No. 5:26-mc-80291
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| X CORP.source ↗ filed by Kronenberger Rosenfeld, LLP · Judge Susan G. Van Keulen · No. 5:26-mc-80291 · Civil Miscellaneous Case · view case timeline → Comparable settlements $59.50M–$725M ▾Comparable rulings split: Bayhealth and Gunnar Optiks survived confidentiality/BIPA claims, while Tower Health and Nuance were dismissed on pixel/BIPA theories, showing no consistent pattern. Comparable settlements $59.50M–$725M median $81.50M · n=10 Meta $725M · Google $425M · Google LLC $135M Per member (realized): ~$29 median · $29–$29 (n=2) Comparable verdict: Google LLC $425.70M · Google LLC $425.65M Key precedent: Doe v. Bayhealth Medical Ctr. — confirms confidentiality/tracking-tech disclosure claims can survive MTD when duty owed to plaintiffs. Main risk: Dismissal risk akin to Tower Health, where pixel/tracking claims failed for lack of individually-identifiable harm. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $90M–$780M Small, heterogeneous comparable set; class size and per-member figures are rough estimates, not case-specific data. · grounded in 8 rulings, 10 settlements, 4 verdicts | Filing | Privacy & Wiretap | N.D. Cal. | 2026-09-23 | $59.50M–$725M comparable settlements |