S.D.N.Y. · No. 1:26-cv-08287
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| World Market, LLCsource ↗ filed by Joseph & Norinsberg, LLC · No. 1:26-cv-08287 · 42:12188 Americans With Disabilities Act - Civil Enforcement Actions · view case timeline → Comparable settlements $65K–$530K ▾Comparable ADA rulings split: Lowell v. Lyft and Billesdon show courts often dismiss ADA claims lacking evidence of effective remedy, while Holmes v. Bax and Burton show ADA/injunctive claims can survive summary judgment or dismissal. Outcome likely hinges on specificity of alleged barriers and standing. Comparable settlements $65K–$530K median $200K · n=3 Covenant Retiremen $530K · Association of Apa $200K · Home Depot U.S.A., $65K Key precedent: Lowell v. Lyft (2d Cir.) - plaintiff bears burden to show proposed accessibility fix is effective; failure to do so dooms ADA claim, relevant to website/store accessibility pleadings. Main risk: Dismissal for failure to plead a concrete, remediable barrier or lack of standing, as in Lowell v. Lyft. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $5K–$500K Small, heterogeneous comparable set; ADA Title III generally caps relief to injunctive/fees, so EV is speculative and sensitive to state-law overlay claims. · grounded in 7 rulings, 3 settlements, 0 verdicts | Filing | ADA / Accessibility | S.D.N.Y. | 2026-09-23 | $65K–$530K comparable settlements |