E.D. Pa. · No. 5:26-cv-07318
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ARCADIA RECOVERY BUREAU, LLCsource ↗ filed by Glanzberg Tobia Law, P.C. · Judge Jeffrey L. Schmehl · No. 5:26-cv-07318 · 15:1692 Fair Debt Collection Act · view case timeline → Comparable settlements $2.25M–$100M ▾Comparable FCRA/FDCPA rulings split sharply: Minano and Soul dismissed claims for insufficient pleading or no private right of action, while Askins and Wright show disclosure/attachment defects can survive or reverse dismissal. No prior Arcadia-specific pattern exists to predict outcome. Comparable settlements $2.25M–$100M median $3.25M · n=10 Equifax $100M · TransUnion $8.31M · Trader Joe's $7.40M Per member (realized): ~$102 median · $25–$500 (n=3) Comparable verdict: TransUnion $60M · TransUnion, LLC $40M Key precedent: Minano v. DLJ Mortgage Capital — shows FCRA furnisher claims often dismissed unless properly pled with specific statutory hooks, a real risk here. Main risk: Dismissal for failure to state a claim or lack of private right of action, as in Minano and Soul rulings. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): –$100K Small, mixed sample; no defendant-specific history or confirmed class size, so estimates are highly speculative. · grounded in 10 rulings, 10 settlements, 2 verdicts | Filing | Consumer Credit (FCRA/FDCPA) | E.D. Pa. | 2026-09-23 | $2.25M–$100M comparable settlements |