Marino v. EUREKA, LTD.

S.D. Fla. · No. 1:26-cv-26635

No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).

Our records for this case (1)

Matter	Type	Practice area	Court	Date	Value
EUREKA, LTD.source ↗ filed by Anthony J. Perez Law Group, PLLC · Judge Rodolfo Armando Ruiz II · No. 1:26-cv-26635 · 42:12182 Americans with Disabilities Act · view case timeline → Comparable settlements $65K–$530K ▾ Comparable rulings split: Lowell v. Lyft affirmed dismissal because plaintiffs failed to prove modification effectiveness, while Holmes v. Bax affirmed ADA claims for plaintiffs; Billesdon reversed most ADA claims except retaliation. Outcome likely turns on specificity of alleged barrier and remedy sought. Comparable settlements $65K–$530K median $200K · n=3 Covenant Retiremen $530K · Association of Apa $200K · Home Depot U.S.A., $65K Key precedent: Lowell v. Lyft (2d Cir.) — shows courts require plaintiffs to prove proposed accommodation is reasonable/effective, a frequent failure point in ADA accessibility suits. Main risk: Dismissal for failure to plead a concrete, effective accommodation, as in Lowell v. Lyft; ADA Title III also bars compensatory damages, capping recovery to fees/injunction. This defendant: Prior $1.0M data-breach settlement shows willingness to settle quickly, but unrelated theory limits predictive value here. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): –$250K Small, heterogeneous comparable set; true defendant identity and class structure (individual vs. class) unclear from web signals, so figures are broad approximations. · grounded in 7 rulings, 3 settlements, 0 verdicts	Filing	ADA / Accessibility	S.D. Fla.	2026-09-23	$65K–$530K comparable settlements