S.D.N.Y. · No. 1:26-cv-08265
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CC116 Corp.source ↗ filed by The Weitz Law Firm, P.A. · Judge Lorna Gail Schofield · No. 1:26-cv-08265 · 42:12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 · view case timeline → Comparable settlements $65K–$530K ▾ADA outcomes split: Holmes v. Bax affirmed ADA violations, while Lowell v. Lyft affirmed dismissal for failure to prove effective modification; Billesdon reversed most ADA claims for insufficient evidence. Comparable settlements $65K–$530K median $200K · n=3 Covenant Retiremen $530K · Association of Apa $200K · Home Depot U.S.A., $65K Key precedent: Lowell v. Lyft (2d Cir.) is most relevant venue-wise (2nd Cir./NY) and shows plaintiffs must prove modification effectiveness, a real dismissal risk. Main risk: Failure to plead/prove a plausible, effective accommodation, as in Lowell v. Lyft, leading to dismissal. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $5K–$60K Small, noisy sample; defendant identity/class size unclear from web signals; figures are rough directional estimates only. · grounded in 7 rulings, 3 settlements, 0 verdicts | Filing | ADA / Accessibility | S.D.N.Y. | 2026-09-22 | $65K–$530K comparable settlements |