S.D.N.Y. · No. 1:26-cv-08264
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Crif Dogs St. Marks LLCsource ↗ filed by The Weitz Law Firm, P.A. · Judge Analisa Nadine Torres · No. 1:26-cv-08264 · 42:12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 · view case timeline → Comparable settlements $65K–$530K ▾ADA public-accommodation suits against small NYC businesses often survive MTD if barriers are plausibly pled (cf. Holmes v. Bax affirming ADA violations), but Lowell v. Lyft shows courts will dismiss where plaintiff fails to show a reasonable, effective modification. Crif Dogs is a single tiny storefront, making standing/mootness defenses (prior remediation) plausible. Comparable settlements $65K–$530K median $200K · n=3 Covenant Retiremen $530K · Association of Apa $200K · Home Depot U.S.A., $65K Key precedent: Lowell v. Lyft, Inc. — shows 2d Cir. will affirm dismissal of ADA accessibility claims absent proof the requested fix is effective, relevant given SDNY venue. Main risk: Mootness/standing dismissal if barriers are remediated pre- or post-filing, or failure to plead a plausible effective accommodation (as in Lowell v. Lyft) Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $2K–$15K Comparables are mostly non-analogous (employment, WAV, credit); settlement data reflects far larger defendants, so figures are rough proxies, not direct anchors. · grounded in 7 rulings, 3 settlements, 0 verdicts | Filing | ADA / Accessibility | S.D.N.Y. | 2026-09-22 | $65K–$530K comparable settlements |