C.D. Cal. · No. 5:26-cv-05548
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Costar Realty Information, Inc.source ↗ filed by Hedin LLP · No. 5:26-cv-05548 · 28:1346 Tort Claim · view case timeline → Comparable settlements $59.50M–$725M ▾Privacy/wiretap claims tied to web tracking show split outcomes: Bayhealth survived a confidentiality claim while Tower Health's Meta Pixel claim was dismissed with prejudice; Integris shows state privacy claims can survive removal but face fact-intensive scrutiny. Comparable settlements $59.50M–$725M median $81.50M · n=10 Meta $725M · Google $425M · Google LLC $135M Per member (realized): ~$29 median · $29–$100 (n=3) Comparable verdict: Google LLC $425.70M · Google LLC $425.65M Key precedent: Doe v. Bayhealth Medical Ctr. — confidentiality claims from tracking tech can survive MTD when a duty analogous to provider-patient trust exists, though CoStar lacks that fiduciary posture. Main risk: Dismissal on statutory grounds akin to Tower Health/Santoro, where pixel/tracking claims failed for lack of individually-identifiable harm or standing. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $5M–$250M No prior CoStar privacy litigation on record; class size and claim theory (wiretap vs. tracking) remain speculative without complaint details. · grounded in 8 rulings, 10 settlements, 4 verdicts | Filing | Privacy & Wiretap | C.D. Cal. | 2026-09-22 | $59.50M–$725M comparable settlements |