D. Nev. · No. 3:26-cv-00714
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| American Addiction Centers, Inc.source ↗ filed by Wise Law Firm, PLC · No. 3:26-cv-00714 · 28:1332 Diversity-(Citizenship) · view case timeline → Comparable settlements $59.50M–$725M ▾Healthcare-tracking privacy claims split sharply across circuits: Bayhealth Medical Ctr. survived breach-of-confidentiality claims for tracking tech, while Tower Health's Meta Pixel claims were dismissed with prejudice and affirmed by the Third Circuit. Nevada courts have not yet settled whether wiretap-style tracking claims against treatment providers survive early motions. Comparable settlements $59.50M–$725M median $81.50M · n=10 Meta $725M · Google $425M · Google LLC $135M Per member (realized): ~$29 median · $29–$29 (n=2) Comparable verdict: Google LLC $425.70M · Google LLC $425.65M Key precedent: Doe v. Bayhealth Medical Ctr. — healthcare provider tracking-tech disclosure claim survived MTD, closest factual analog to AAC's likely pixel/chat tracking exposure. Main risk: Dismissal on consent/HIPAA-exclusion or lack-of-interception grounds, as in Tower Health (Meta Pixel claims dismissed, affirmed 3rd Cir.) and Nuance (BIPA exemption). This defendant: AAC previously settled a data breach suit for $2.8M, showing willingness to settle privacy claims rather than litigate to verdict. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $450K–$6.30M Small comparable sample, mixed circuit outcomes, and no direct AAC wiretap ruling make this a low-confidence, directional estimate only. · grounded in 8 rulings, 10 settlements, 4 verdicts | Filing | Privacy & Wiretap | D. Nev. | 2026-09-21 | $59.50M–$725M comparable settlements |