E.D. Pa. · No. 2:26-cv-07275
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FRONTAGE LABORATORIES, INC.source ↗ filed by CONSOLE MATTIACCI LAW LLC · Judge Mary Kay Costello · No. 2:26-cv-07275 · 29:621 Job Discrimination (Age) · view case timeline → Comparable settlements $59.50M–$725M ▾Third Circuit's Santoro v. Tower Health affirmed dismissal of nearly identical Meta Pixel health-data claims, directly binding in E.D. Pa., while Doe v. Bayhealth shows confidentiality claims can survive if pled as breach of duty rather than pure wiretap theory. Comparable settlements $59.50M–$725M median $81.50M · n=10 Meta $725M · Google $425M · Google LLC $135M Per member (realized): ~$29 median · $29–$29 (n=2) Comparable verdict: Google LLC $425.70M · Google LLC $425.65M Key precedent: Patrick Santoro v. Tower Health (3rd Cir.) - controlling circuit precedent affirming dismissal of tracking-technology health privacy claims, weighing heavily against survival here. Main risk: Third Circuit precedent (Tower Health) makes dismissal with prejudice a real possibility for similar tracking/disclosure theories in this circuit Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $50K–$5M Small sample of realized per-member data and unclear class definition for a B2B/CRO defendant make this estimate highly speculative. · grounded in 8 rulings, 10 settlements, 4 verdicts | Filing | Privacy & Wiretap | E.D. Pa. | 2026-09-21 | $59.50M–$725M comparable settlements |