M.D.N.C. · No. 1:26-cv-00957
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| COMPASS GROUP USA, INC. D/B/A CANTEENsource ↗ filed by SPITZ LAW FIRM · No. 1:26-cv-00957 · 42:2000e Job Discrimination (Employment) · view case timeline → Comparable settlements $59.50M–$725M ▾Comparable privacy/wiretap rulings split roughly evenly—Doe v. Bayhealth's confidentiality claim survived while Tower Health's Meta Pixel claim was dismissed for delay, and Gunnar Optiks shows courts often defer dismissal pending factual development. This suggests Compass's wiretap/tracking claim faces a genuine but uncertain path past 12(b)(6). Comparable settlements $59.50M–$725M median $81.50M · n=10 Meta $725M · Google $425M · Google LLC $135M Per member (realized): ~$29 median · $29–$29 (n=2) Comparable verdict: Google LLC $425.70M · Google LLC $425.65M Key precedent: Doe v. Bayhealth Medical Ctr. — confidentiality claim survived MTD, showing courts will sustain privacy claims against service providers handling personal data via tracking tech. Main risk: Dismissal on statutory technicalities (e.g., consent/exemption or delay) as in Tower Health and Nuance, where defenses mooted otherwise plausible claims This defendant: Compass previously settled a Fees/Auto-Renewal case for $6.9M, showing willingness to settle consumer claims rather than litigate to trial. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $1.50M–$80M Small comparable sample, unclear exact wiretap theory/jurisdiction basis, and no confirmed class size data—figures are illustrative ranges only. · grounded in 8 rulings, 10 settlements, 4 verdicts | Filing | Privacy & Wiretap | M.D.N.C. | 2026-09-18 | $59.50M–$725M comparable settlements |