M.D. Fla. · No. 8:26-cv-02747
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHASTAIN-SKILLMAN, LLCsource ↗ filed by Nace Law Group Accident & Injury Lawyers · No. 8:26-cv-02747 · 28:1332 Diversity-Torts to Land · view case timeline → Comparable settlements $59.50M–$725M ▾Privacy/wiretap claims survive dismissal in cases with plausible confidentiality duties (Doe v. Bayhealth) but fail when tied to routine analytics tools absent concrete harm (Santoro v. Tower Health). Chastain-Skillman is a small firm, so outcome will hinge on specifics of alleged interception, not scale. Comparable settlements $59.50M–$725M median $81.50M · n=10 Meta $725M · Google $425M · Google LLC $135M Per member (realized): ~$29 median · $29–$29 (n=2) Comparable verdict: Google LLC $425.70M · Google LLC $425.65M Key precedent: Doe v. Bayhealth Medical Ctr. — confidentiality claims survived MTD where provider owed duty; suggests plausible path past dismissal if similar duty alleged here. Main risk: Dismissal for lack of concrete injury or failure to plead unauthorized third-party disclosure, as in Santoro v. Tower Health. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $4K–$145K Small defendant size and no prior litigation history make class size and per-member recovery highly speculative; mega-settlement comparables are not scale-appropriate. · grounded in 8 rulings, 10 settlements, 4 verdicts | Filing | Privacy & Wiretap | M.D. Fla. | 2026-09-18 | $59.50M–$725M comparable settlements |