← Records

Feltzin v. TAMARAC HOTELS, INC.

S.D. Fla. · No. 0:26-cv-62619

Full docket on CourtListener ↗

No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).

Our records for this case (1)

MatterTypePractice areaCourtDateValue
TAMARAC HOTELS, INC.source ↗
filed by Law Office of Ramon J. Diego, P.A. · Judge William P. Dimitrouleas · No. 0:26-cv-62619 · 42:12182 Americans with Disabilities Act · view case timeline →
Comparable settlements $65K–$530K ▾
Comparable rulings split: Lowell v. Lyft affirmed dismissal where plaintiffs failed to prove reasonable modification effectiveness, while Holmes v. Bax affirmed ADA claims at summary judgment, showing outcome hinges on factual specificity of accessibility barriers alleged.
Comparable settlements $65K–$530K median $200K · n=3
Covenant Retiremen $530K · Association of Apa $200K · Home Depot U.S.A., $65K
Key precedent: Lowell v. Lyft (2d Cir.) - shows plaintiffs bear burden to prove proposed accommodation is reasonable/effective, a common failure point in ADA Title III suits.
Main risk: Dismissal for failure to plead a concrete, effective proposed modification, as in Lowell v. Lyft.
Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): –$10K
No direct ADA hotel-accessibility settlement/verdict comps; figures extrapolated from unrelated statutes and multi-property settlements, so precision is low. · grounded in 7 rulings, 3 settlements, 0 verdicts
FilingADA / AccessibilityS.D. Fla.2026-09-18$65K–$530K
comparable settlements