M.D. Fla. · No. 6:26-cv-02107
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Licking Orlando, LLCsource ↗ filed by Sconzo Law Office, P.A. · No. 6:26-cv-02107 · Americans with Disabilities Act · view case timeline → Comparable settlements $65K–$530K ▾ADA Title III accessibility suits split in comparables: Holmes v. Bax affirmed ADA violations while Lowell v. Lyft and Billesdon show courts dismissing/reversing ADA claims absent proof of effective, reasonable modifications. Small single-location restaurant defendant lacks the scale of larger settled entities (Home Depot, Covenant Retirement), suggesting lower exposure. Comparable settlements $65K–$530K median $200K · n=3 Covenant Retiremen $530K · Association of Apa $200K · Home Depot U.S.A., $65K Key precedent: Lowell v. Lyft (2d Cir.) — plaintiff bears burden to show proposed accommodation is reasonable/effective; failure to do so is fatal, a real risk for generic barrier-removal complaints. Main risk: Plaintiff fails to specify concrete, reasonable architectural modifications, mirroring Lowell v. Lyft's dismissal for lack of proof of an effective remedy. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $5K–$40K Single small-business defendant with no prior ADA history; sample settlements involve much larger entities, so figures are rough scaled estimates, not directly comparable. · grounded in 7 rulings, 3 settlements, 0 verdicts | Filing | ADA / Accessibility | M.D. Fla. | 2026-09-18 | $65K–$530K comparable settlements |