D.S.C. · No. 4:26-cv-04112
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LexisNexis Risk Solutions Inc.source ↗ filed by Hays Cauley PC · Judge Joseph Dawson III · No. 4:26-cv-04112 · 15:1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act · view case timeline → Comparable settlements $59.50M–$725M ▾Comparable privacy claims split: Bayhealth's confidentiality claim survived while Tower Health and Santoro's Pixel-based claims were dismissed; Integris shows courts scrutinize data-sharing theories closely. LexisNexis's data-broker model raises similar unauthorized-disclosure exposure but outcomes are fact-dependent. Comparable settlements $59.50M–$725M median $81.50M · n=10 Meta $725M · Google $425M · Google LLC $135M Per member (realized): ~$29 median · $29–$29 (n=2) Comparable verdict: Google LLC $425.70M · Google LLC $425.65M Key precedent: Doe v. Bayhealth Medical Ctr. — confidentiality claim for third-party data sharing survived, showing viable path if duty/relationship is well-pled. Main risk: Dismissal on statutory/contractual grounds as in Tower Health and Santoro, where health/data-sharing claims failed due to lack of individualized harm or improper theory fit. This defendant: Multiple prior FCRA/FDCPA filings against LexisNexis suggest recurring exposure to consumer data-handling litigation. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $45M–$900M Small comparable sample, wide range in per-member recovery and class size; actual outcome hinges on specific data-sharing conduct alleged and certification odds. · grounded in 8 rulings, 10 settlements, 4 verdicts | Filing | Privacy & Wiretap | D.S.C. | 2026-09-17 | $59.50M–$725M comparable settlements |