S.D.N.Y. · No. 1:26-cv-08131
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ledge Lounger, Inc.source ↗ filed by Gottlieb & Associates · Judge Jennifer H. Rearden · No. 1:26-cv-08131 · 42:12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 · view case timeline → Comparable settlements $65K–$530K ▾ADA accessibility claims show split outcomes: Lowell v. Lyft affirmed dismissal for failure to prove effective modification, while Holmes v. Bax affirmed ADA violations at summary judgment; Billesdon shows accommodation claims often reversed on insufficient evidence. Comparable settlements $65K–$530K median $200K · n=3 Covenant Retiremen $530K · Association of Apa $200K · Home Depot U.S.A., $65K Key precedent: Lowell v. Lyft (2d Cir.) — controls in this circuit, dismissing ADA claims where plaintiff can't show proposed accommodation is effective/feasible. Main risk: Dismissal for failure to plead a plausible, effective accommodation, as in Lowell v. Lyft affirmed by 2d Cir. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $5K–$200K Small, heterogeneous comparable set; likely individual ADA website-accessibility suit rather than true class action, limiting extrapolation. · grounded in 7 rulings, 3 settlements, 0 verdicts | Filing | ADA / Accessibility | S.D.N.Y. | 2026-09-18 | $65K–$530K comparable settlements |