S.D.N.Y. · No. 1:26-cv-08130
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blaklader, LLCsource ↗ filed by Gottlieb & Associates · Judge Edgardo Ramos · No. 1:26-cv-08130 · 42:12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 · view case timeline → Comparable settlements $65K–$530K ▾Lowell v. Lyft shows ADA accessibility claims fail without proof modifications are effective, while Holmes v. Bax shows ADA claims can survive at summary judgment; outcome is fact-specific and venue-dependent. Comparable settlements $65K–$530K median $200K · n=3 Covenant Retiremen $530K · Association of Apa $200K · Home Depot U.S.A., $65K Key precedent: Lowell v. Lyft (2d Cir.) is most relevant as controlling S.D.N.Y./2d Cir. authority requiring plaintiff to prove proposed accommodation is reasonable and effective. Main risk: Dismissal for failure to plead a plausible, effective accommodation, as in Lowell v. Lyft affirming dismissal on this exact ground Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $5K–$150K Small, heterogeneous comparable set mixing ADA sub-theories (website, employment, transit); true class size and per-member data for this defendant are unverified. · grounded in 7 rulings, 3 settlements, 0 verdicts | Filing | ADA / Accessibility | S.D.N.Y. | 2026-09-18 | $65K–$530K comparable settlements |