M.D. Fla. · No. 8:26-cv-02729
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pomcar LLCsource ↗ filed by The Hyman Law Firm PA · No. 8:26-cv-02729 · 28:1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury · view case timeline → Comparable settlements $59.50M–$725M ▾Comparable privacy rulings split roughly evenly: Bayhealth and Gunnar Optiks survived on tracking-tech theories, while Tower Health and Nuance were dismissed on similar Meta Pixel/biometric grounds. Pomcar's small consumer footprint makes outcome fact-dependent on data-collection specifics. Comparable settlements $59.50M–$725M median $81.50M · n=10 Meta $725M · Google $425M · Google LLC $135M Per member (realized): ~$29 median · $29–$29 (n=2) Comparable verdict: Google LLC $425.70M · Google LLC $425.65M Key precedent: Doe v. Bayhealth Medical Ctr. — survived confidentiality claim for tracking-tech disclosure, closest analog to a wiretap/privacy theory against a smaller consumer-facing defendant. Main risk: Dismissal on statutory-exemption or pleading-specificity grounds, as in Tower Health and Nuance where courts found exemptions or insufficient particularity. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $34K–$2.25M Small, mostly health-privacy comparable set with limited direct wiretap precedent; class size is speculative absent defendant-specific data. · grounded in 8 rulings, 10 settlements, 4 verdicts | Filing | Privacy & Wiretap | M.D. Fla. | 2026-09-17 | $59.50M–$725M comparable settlements |