Hernandez v. Labcorp Holdings Inc.

S.D. Fla. · No. 1:26-cv-26426

No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).

Our records for this case (1)

Matter	Type	Practice area	Court	Date	Value
Labcorp Holdings Inc.source ↗ filed by Mendez Law Offices, PLLC · Judge Jose E. Martinez · No. 1:26-cv-26426 · 42:12182 Americans with Disabilities Act · view case timeline → Comparable settlements $65K–$530K ▾ Complaint theory is mislabeled: the class definition describes Meta Pixel data-interception, not ADA accessibility, so the ADA comparables (Lowell, Billesdon) are only weakly analogous; mixed outcomes there reflect general MTD uncertainty for accessibility-style claims. Comparable settlements $65K–$530K median $200K · n=3 Covenant Retiremen $530K · Association of Apa $200K · Home Depot U.S.A., $65K Class (from complaint): California and Pennsylvania classes of all persons whose personally identifiable information and electronic communications were obtained by Meta through the Met Key precedent: Lowell v. Lyft (2d Cir.) affirmed dismissal—shows courts require concrete proof of harm/effectiveness, a hurdle likely for this pixel-tracking claim too. Main risk: Mismatch between pled theory and actual factual basis (Meta Pixel/privacy, not accessibility) could trigger dismissal on standing or mislabeled cause of action, as seen in Lowell. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $1M–$100M Theory label (ADA) conflicts with class definition (Meta Pixel privacy); comparables are not directly on-point, so estimate is highly speculative. · grounded in 7 rulings, 3 settlements, 0 verdicts	Filing	ADA / Accessibility	S.D. Fla.	2026-09-17	$65K–$530K comparable settlements