S.D.N.Y. · No. 1:26-cv-08091
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| March Products, Inc.source ↗ filed by Gottlieb & Associates · No. 1:26-cv-08091 · 42:12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 · view case timeline → Comparable settlements $65K–$530K ▾Lowell v. Lyft (2d Cir.) shows courts require plaintiffs to prove effective accommodation, risking dismissal, while Holmes v. Bax shows ADA claims often survive summary judgment when pled with due-process/statutory hooks. Small settlement sample ($0.1-0.5M) suggests modest resolution values for accessibility suits. Comparable settlements $65K–$530K median $200K · n=3 Covenant Retiremen $530K · Association of Apa $200K · Home Depot U.S.A., $65K Key precedent: Lowell v. Lyft (2d Cir.) - controlling circuit precedent for S.D.N.Y., dismisses ADA claims absent proof of effective modification. Main risk: Dismissal for failure to plead/prove an effective, reasonable modification, as in Lowell v. Lyft. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): –$112K No prior records on defendant; small, heterogeneous comparable set; true class size and claim structure (individual vs. class) unclear from web signals. · grounded in 7 rulings, 3 settlements, 0 verdicts | Filing | ADA / Accessibility | S.D.N.Y. | 2026-09-17 | $65K–$530K comparable settlements |